Pharmacognostical, Physicochemical and Phytochemical studies of different varieties of Beet root grown in Punjab
Neeraj Bainsal1*, Simranjeet Kaur2, Sudhanshu Mallan2
1Assistant Prof., Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, India.
2Student, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: neerajbainsal125@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Objective: The current study aims was carried out for Pharmacognostical, Physicochemical and phytochemical screening of three varieties viz. maritima, altissima, alba of Beta vulgaris grown in Ludhiana, Punjab. Methods: As a part of Pharmacognostical studies macroscopic and powder microscopic studies was performed. Loss on drying, Ash content (Total ash, Acid insoluble ash, water soluble ash), pH of aqueous extract, Extractive value (Pet. Ether, methanol, water) was performed under Physicochemical analysis. The dried powders were subjected to solvent extraction for preliminary secondary metabolites analysis and fluorescence study done with root powder. Results: The powder microscopy for the roots shows fibers and vacuoles in var. alba. Xylem and phloem are present forming cambium present in var. maritima and altimisia. Physicochemical parameters such as Total ash were observed 52%, 8%, 13% for var. maritima, alba, altissima respectively. The phytochemical screening also confirms the presence of flavonoids and phytosterols among all three varieties. The fluorescence analysis showed the different behavior of root powders. Conclusion: This study will help in authentication and standardization of different 3 varieties of Beet root. The present findings of this study concludes that Beta vulgaris roots have the great potential to act as a source of positive drugs because all three varieties have flavonoids, phytosterols, terpenoids and saponins. These phytoconstituents have the potential to act as a source of functional drug and also improves the physical condition of the patients as a result of the presence of various compounds that plays fundamental role for good health.
KEYWORDS: Phytochemical screening, Total ash, standardization, fluorescence, Physical compound.
INTRODUCTION:
Almost 12,000 plants are known to have medicinal properties out of 248, 000 identified species of higher plants3. Studies of plants continue principally for uncovering novel secondary metabolites or phytochemicals derived from plants exhibiting protective functions for human beings4. It becomes necessary action to assure the identity of plant and check its quality before use5.
Beetroot (Beta vulgaris) is a medicinal plant of great importance belonging to family Chenopodiaceae. It is rich in fibre, folate, manganese, potassium and iron. It is a vegetable root also known as red beet, garden beet and table beet. It is used as herb in traditional medicine system for the treatment of hypertension, infertility, antioxidant, urinary tract disorders and cancer. Recently, due to increase of herbal products it has been widely used in food industry to extract out harmless colour pigments (betanin) and also for the same purpose in cosmetic industry. It is medicinally important as it has shown antioxidant, antiviral and antimicrobial activity in recent studies. The yellow and red pigments known as betalains comprises red violet betacyanins and yellow betaxanthins out of which betanin is the major constituent 75-95%. Other components present are isobetanidine isobetanin, prebetanin, vulgaxanthin and isoprebetanin. Red beet when cooked with steam distillation, it yields various volatile constituents which are pyridine and 4-picolene6,7.
MATERIALS AND METHOD:
Plant collection:
The different three varieties of beet root were grown in Ludhiana and collected in the month of January. Roots were identified by botany department of Chandigarh University. Healthy and full grown roots were taken and used for study.
Macroscopic and Microscopic Evaluation:
The macroscopic characters were identified by naked eyes and for powder microscopic studies Phase contrast microscope was used and various identifying characters were evaluated using staining. Staining procedures were performed as per standard procedure8.
Physicochemical Analysis:
Loss on drying, Ash content (Total ash content, Acid insoluble ash content, water soluble ash content), Extractive value (Pet. Ether, methanol, water), pH value of extract was performed3.
Extraction of Plant Material:
All the three varieties of Beta vulgaris were powdered and shade dried. Extraction was carried out with 95% of ethanol at reflux for 2 hours. Extracts are used for preliminary phytochemical screening.
RESULTS:
Microscopic studies
The thick walled fibers are present; cell vacuoles are largely distributed in the Beta vulgaris alba. Starch grains and crystals of calcium oxalate are completely absent in all three varieties of Beta vulgaris. Vascular bundles are present, which are of collateral type. Xylem and phloem are present forming from cambium, alongside the vascular bundles.
|
Figure 1 Var. Maritima |
Figure 2: Var Alba |
Figure 3: Var Altissima |
Fb – Fibres, ca – Cambium, Vc – Vacuoles
Table 1. Macroscopic studies
|
Characters |
Beta vulgaris maritima |
Beta vulgaris alba |
Beta vulgaris altissima |
|
Colour |
Dark red |
Yellow |
White |
|
Odour |
Characteristic |
Characteristic |
Characteristic |
|
Taste |
Astringent |
Sweet |
Sweet |
|
Shape |
Globular |
Globular |
Globular |
|
Size |
6cm |
5cm |
6cm |
|
Texture |
Smooth |
Smooth |
Smooth |
Table 2. Fluorescence analysis of root powder
|
Treatment (Root powder + chemicals |
Beta vulgaris maritima |
Beta vulgaris alba |
Beta vulgaris altissima |
||||||
|
Day light |
UV (254nm) |
UV (365 nm) |
Day light |
UV (254nm) |
UV (365 nm) |
Day light
|
UV (254nm) |
UV (365 nm) |
|
|
Powder as such |
Red |
Dark red |
Green |
Buff |
White |
Light green |
White |
Dark red |
Green |
|
5% NaOH |
Yellow |
Green |
Black |
White |
Yellow |
Light green |
White |
Green |
Yellow |
|
Sulphuric acid |
Light brown |
Brown |
Dark brown |
Yellow |
Green |
Bluish green |
Brown |
Brown |
Black |
|
Nitric acid |
Yellow |
Green |
Dark blue |
Brown |
Green |
Dark green |
Brown |
Green |
Black |
|
Acetic acid |
Red |
Dark red |
Black |
Buff |
White |
Yellow |
White |
Dark red |
Yellow |
|
HCL |
Red |
Dark red |
Black |
White |
White |
Green |
White |
Dark red |
Yellow |
|
Chloroform |
Red |
Dark red |
Green |
White |
Yellow |
Green |
White |
Dark red |
Green |
|
Acetone |
Red |
Dark red |
Black |
White |
White |
Green |
White |
Dark red |
Green |
|
Ferric chloride |
Blue |
Dark blue |
Black |
Pale yellow |
Green |
Dark green |
Yellow |
Dark blue |
Dark green |
|
KOH 1% |
Red |
Yellow |
Green |
Buff |
White |
Light green |
White |
Yellow |
Green |
Table 3. Physico-chemical Analysis of Root powders
|
Parameters |
Beta vulgaris maritima |
Beta vulgaris alba |
Beta vulgaris altissima |
|
Total ash (%) |
52% |
8% |
13% |
|
Acid insoluble ash (%) |
3.8% |
25% |
15% |
|
Water soluble ash (%) |
7.6% |
75% |
38% |
|
Foreign matter |
Nil |
Nil |
Nil |
|
Loss on drying (%) |
33% |
57% |
44% |
|
pH of 1% aqueous solution |
7.28 |
6.91 |
7.37 |
|
pH of 10% aqueous solution |
6.75 |
7.04 |
7.48 |
|
Extractive value |
|
||
|
Pet- ether soluble Extractive value |
53% |
46% |
90% |
|
Methanol soluble Extractive value |
91% |
91% |
92% |
|
Water soluble extractive value |
90% |
88% |
89% |
Table 4. Preliminary Phytochemical screening of root powders
|
S. No |
Test for |
Beta vulgaris maritima |
Beta vulgaris alba |
Beta vulgaris altissima |
|
1. |
Alkaloids |
- |
- |
- |
|
2. |
Carbohydrates |
- |
- |
- |
|
3. |
Saponins |
+ |
- |
- |
|
4. |
Glycosides |
- |
- |
- |
|
5. |
Tanins |
- |
- |
- |
|
6. |
Terpenoids |
+ |
+ |
- |
|
7. |
Phenols |
- |
- |
- |
|
8. |
Flavanoids |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
9. |
Phytosterols |
+ |
+ |
+ |
|
10. |
Proteins and amino acids |
- |
- |
- |
DISCUSSION:
Herbal plants play important role in the development of new drugs9. Herbal healing is the art deep rooted in Indian culture. This traditional system is still followed in rural areas10. Identity of crude drugs and appropriate botanical value is very important in establishing quality of herbal drugs11. To assure the quality and clinical efficacy of medicinal plants, determination of the morphological and microscopical characters is the key factor12. Fluorescence analysis is the important primary parameter in the standardization of crude drugs. The Root powders treated with many chemicals and reagents separately and exposed to visible and ultraviolet light (Short and long) to study their fluorescence behavior13,14.
Phytochemicals such as flavonoids, saponins, tannins, terpenoids and steroids have anti-inflammatory effects15-18. The phenolic and carotenoid compounds of plants are known for their invaluable effects on human beings and present in varieties of vegetables and plants19. Additionally, other large family of phytoconstituents are flavonoids also known as bioflavonoids present in fruits and vegetables act as antioxidants20. Flavonoids have well-known Free radicals scavenging activity, which emphasizes their antibacterial, anti-thrombotic, ani-inflammatory and vasodilatory activities21. Synthesis of flavonoids are response of microbial infection hence they exhibit in-vitro antimicrobial activity. Terpenoids are most widespread chemical group of natural products reported with antioxidant, anticancer, sedatives, cytotoxic activity, anti-inflammatory etc22. Various physicochemical parameters were recognized which can be important in detecting adulteration and mishandling of medicinal plants23. In current times more preference has given to use eco-friendly and bio-friendly plant based medicines for the prevention and cure of various human ailments. Because of side effects of synthetics drugs. The modern population also looking for remedies from natural sources24.
CONFLICTS OF INTERSEST:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES:
1. Kiritikar KR, Basu BD. Indian medicinal plants, Lalit Mohan Basu, Allahabad, vol II, 1933: 1478–1480.
2. Nostro A et al. Extraction methods and bioautography for evaluation of medicinal plant antimicrobial activity. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2000; 30(5): 379–385.
3. Mukharjee P. K. Quality Control of Herbal Drugs, Pharmaceutical Publication, 1st edition, 2002.
4. Kennedy DO, Wightman EL. Herbal extracts and phytochemicals: plant secondary metabolites and the enhancement of human brain function. Advances in Nutrition. 2011; 2(1): 32-50
5. Jiby Elias et al. Pharmacognostic Standardization of Solanum melongena var. insanum Linn. Research Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2010; 2(5): 364-367.
6. Ahmad Adil et al. Pharmacogonostic specifications of roots of Beta vulgaris cultivated in India. Asian Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences; 2013, 3(26): 5-10
7. Masniah Jamidin Manurung Phytochemical screening and activities of Binahong (Anredera cordifolia [TEN.] Steenis) leaves and beetroot (Beta vulgaris l.) in increasing swimming endurance in mice. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2019; 12 (4): 235-23
8. Jothi G et al. Pharmacogonostic, physiochemical and phytochemical studies on stem bark of Zanthoxylum armatum DC. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2019; 12 (2); 1-5.
9. Settu Sugashini, Arunachalam Sathiavelu. Comparison of Phytochemical analysis and in vitro Pharmacological activities of most commonly available medicinal plants belonging to the Cucurbitaceae family. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019; 12(4):1541-1546.
10. Sandeep B et al. Some Medicinal Plants Used by People of Sangli District, Maharashtra. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2011; 1(2): 42-43
11. Sandhya S, et al. Pharmacognostical Standardization of Tephrosia maxima Pers root. Pharmacogn Journal. 2011; 3(26): 25-33.
12. Cheng D et al. Comparative Pharmacognosy of Pyrrosia petiolosa and Pyrrosia davidii. Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy. 2014; 24(4): 368-80.
13. Pratt RT, Chase CR. Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs with particular reference to development of a system of identification. Journal of American Pharmaceutical Association., 1949; 38: 324-331.
14. Kokoshi CJ et al. Fluorescence of powdered vegetable drugs under ultra-violet radiation, Journal of American Pharmaceutical Association. 1958, 47: 715.
15. Liu RH, Health benefits of fruit and vegetables are from additive and synergistic combinations of phytochemicals, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2003, 78, 517S-520S.
16. Manach C et al. Bioavailability, metabolism and physiological impact of 4-oxo-flavonoids, Nutritional Research. 1996, 16,517- 544.
17. Latha RM et al. Effect of Vernonia cinerea less flower extract in adjuvant induced arthritis, Gen Pharm, 1998, 31, 601-606.
18. Akindele AJ, Adeyemi OO, Anti-inflammatory activity of the aqueous leaf extract of Byrsocarpus coccineus, Fitoterapia, 2007, 78, 25- 28.
19. Esther Lydia et al. Investigation on the Phytochemicals present in the Fruit peel of Carica papaya and evaluation of its Antioxidant and Antimicrobial property. Research Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2016; 8(4): 217-222.
20. Thenmozhi A., Mahadeva U.S Rao. Secondary Metabolite screening, Bioactive compound extraction, and Disrupting Mitotic Activity of Wild Cabbage [Brassicaceae] towards Cancer Management. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2012; 2(1): 19-31.
21. Hosu A et al. Analysis of total phenolic, flavonoids, anthocyanins and tannins content in Romanian red wines: Prediction of antioxidant activities and classification of wines using artificial neural networks. Food Chemistry. 2014; 150:113-8.
22. Gray A. M. and Flatt P. R. Insulin-releasing and insulin-like activity of the traditional anti-diabetic plant Coriandrum sativum (coriander). British Journal of Nutrition. 1999; 81 (3): 203–209
23. Wal Pranay et al. Pharmacognostic Evaluation and Standardization of the leaves of Punica granatum. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019.
24. D. Saha et al. Pharmacognostic Studies of Leaf of Lippia alba. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2011; 1(1): 17-18.
Received on 27.03.2020 Modified on 25.05.2020
Accepted on 15.06.2020 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2021; 14(3):1689-1692.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2021.00300.0